Not on my final, fortunately, but it came up in a discussion. Without seeing the question, see if you can answer it.

Find the volume of ……

A. 5 cm^{3}

B. 10 cm^{3}

C. 12 cm^{3}

D. 12 cm^{2}

(sigh)

Filed under: Education, Mathematics

Posted on May 16, 2008 by Jason Dyer

Not on my final, fortunately, but it came up in a discussion. Without seeing the question, see if you can answer it.

Find the volume of ……

A. 5 cm^{3}

B. 10 cm^{3}

C. 12 cm^{3}

D. 12 cm^{2}

(sigh)

Filed under: Education, Mathematics

%d bloggers like this:

Mr. K, on May 16, 2008 at 2:51 pm said:Lemme guess: rectangular prism?

(I can create triangular prisms or rectangular pyramids with integer dimensions for two of those answers, so that can’t be it. I can create a tetrahedron with integer dimensions for all three of the volume answers, so that can’t be it either…)

Jason Dyer, on May 16, 2008 at 3:43 pm said:I mean trying to guess the answer, not what the original question was. đŸ˜‰

samjshah, on May 16, 2008 at 3:53 pm said:C. Sigh.

It’s pretty funny, actually.

Jackie, on May 16, 2008 at 5:16 pm said:C

Writing good distractors is tough, but not

thattough.Today my seniors were upset that the choices on the multiple choice will include conceptual errors. They wanted the other choices to be things like zebra, apple, or UFO. On a math test.

mbork, on May 17, 2008 at 1:07 pm said:And what if the man who set this question thought “Well, they will be guessing… Let make one of the answers _look_ probable… And the right one is of course 5 cm^3…”

You must admit that this is possible (and rather smart, I guess;))

jd2718, on July 4, 2008 at 7:03 am said:I missed this, I think.

I wanted to go for , but no. Why would 5, 10, and 12 be possible numeric values? One is a sum, one is a product, one is a goof.

What is the volume of a rectangular prism with a square base, 1 cm on each side, and a height of 10 cm?

We have or or for a goof

How’d I do?

Jason Dyer, on July 4, 2008 at 7:17 am said:You were one of those kids in high school who when they showed you one of those “find the next term in the pattern” puzzles found something different than just adding two, aren’t you?

jd2718, on July 4, 2008 at 8:38 am said:Yes, but….

Doesn’t that make sense? If it was 12x1x1 or 6x2x1 or 4x3x1 o3 3x2x2, then 10 and 5 would be lousy distractors, right?

Jason Dyer, on July 4, 2008 at 10:16 am said:It does!

Unfortunately, the person who wrote the test wasn’t able to think that far.

Some Places To Visit On The Interweb « Continuous Everywhere but Differentiable Nowhere, on August 11, 2012 at 6:39 pm said:[…] Exceedingly Lame Final QuestionÂ and Counterexamples (The Number Warrior) […]